Several candidates who appeared for the examination have raised allegations of irregularities and possible manipulation in the selection process. The controversy has prompted questions about the way candidates were shortlisted.
Responding to the concerns, the PPSC chairman reportedly said that differences in results were normal. He also claimed that 10 candidates had been selected from each examination room.
The chairman’s clarification comes amid growing questions from candidates about the examination results. However, the available report does not provide further details about the selection data, the basis for the room-wise claim or any formal response to the allegations of irregularities.
The PCS Mains results remain a subject of discussion among candidates, who have questioned the fairness of the process. The commission’s explanation is expected to be considered alongside the concerns raised by those who appeared for the examination.
